Resilience assessment in complex natural systems
- 1. University of Padua
- 2. Universität Hamburg
- 3. Joint Research Centre
- 4. University of Patras
- 5. International Livestock Research Institute
Description
Ecological resilience is the capability of an ecosystem to maintain the same structure and function and avoid crossing catastrophic tipping points (i.e. undergoing irreversible regime shifts). While fundamental for management, concrete ways to estimate and interpret resilience in real ecosystems are still lacking. Here, we develop an empirical approach to estimate resilience based on the stochastic cusp model derived from catastrophe theory. The cusp model models tipping points derived from a cusp bifurcation. We extend cusp in order to identify the presence of stable and unstable states in complex natural systems. Our Cusp Resilience Assessment (CUSPRA) has three characteristics: (i) it provides estimates on how likely a system is to cross a tipping point (in the form of a cusp bifurcation) characterized by hysteresis, (ii) it assesses resilience in relation to multiple external drivers and (iii) it produces straightforward results for ecosystem-based management. We validate our approach using simulated data and demonstrate its application using empirical time series of an Atlantic cod population and marine ecosystems in the North Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. We show that Cusp Resilience Assessment is a powerful method to empirically estimate resilience in support of a sustainable management of our constantly adapting ecosystems under global climate change.
Translated Descriptions
Translated Description (Arabic)
المرونة البيئية هي قدرة النظام البيئي على الحفاظ على نفس الهيكل والوظيفة وتجنب عبور نقاط التحول الكارثية (أي الخضوع لتحولات النظام التي لا رجعة فيها). على الرغم من أنها أساسية للإدارة، إلا أنه لا تزال هناك حاجة إلى طرق ملموسة لتقدير وتفسير المرونة في النظم الإيكولوجية الحقيقية. هنا، نطور نهجًا تجريبيًا لتقدير المرونة بناءً على نموذج الحدبة العشوائية المستمد من نظرية الكارثة. يقوم نموذج الشرفة بنمذجة نقاط الانقلاب المستمدة من تشعب الشرفة. نحن نوسع الشرفة من أجل تحديد وجود حالات مستقرة وغير مستقرة في النظم الطبيعية المعقدة. يتميز تقييمنا لمرونة الشرفة (CUSPRA) بثلاث خصائص: (1) يوفر تقديرات حول مدى احتمال عبور النظام لنقطة تحول (في شكل تشعب الشرفة) تتميز بالتخلف، (2) يقيم المرونة فيما يتعلق بالعديد من الدوافع الخارجية و (3) ينتج عنه نتائج مباشرة للإدارة القائمة على النظام البيئي. نحن نتحقق من صحة نهجنا باستخدام بيانات محاكاة ونوضح تطبيقه باستخدام سلسلة زمنية تجريبية لسكان سمك القد الأطلسي والنظم الإيكولوجية البحرية في بحر الشمال والبحر الأبيض المتوسط. نظهر أن تقييم القدرة على الصمود Cusp هو طريقة قوية لتقدير المرونة تجريبيًا لدعم الإدارة المستدامة لنظمنا الإيكولوجية المتكيفة باستمرار في ظل تغير المناخ العالمي.Translated Description (English)
Ecological resilience is the ability of an ecosystem to maintain the same structure and function and avoid crossing catastrophic tipping points (i.e. undergoing irreversible regime shifts). While fundamental for management, concrete ways to estimate and interpret resilience in real ecosystems are still lacking. Here, we develop an empirical approach to estimate resilience based on the stochastic cusp model derived from catastrophe theory. The cusp model models tipping points derived from a cusp bifurcation. We extend cusp in order to identify the presence of stable and unstable states in complex natural systems. Our Cusp Resilience Assessment (CUSPRA) has three characteristics: (i) it provides estimates on how likely a system is to cross a tipping point (in the form of a cusp bifurcation) characterized by hysteresis, (ii) it assesses resilience in relation to multiple external drivers and (iii) it produces straightforward results for ecosystem-based management. We validate our approach using simulated data and demonstrate its application using empirical time series of an Atlantic cod population and marine ecosystems in the North Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. We show that Cusp Resilience Assessment is a powerful method to empirically estimate resilience in support of a sustainable management of our constantly adapting ecosystems under global climate change.Translated Description (Spanish)
Ecological resilience is the capability of an ecosystem to maintain the same structure and function and avoid crossing catastrophic tipping points (i.e. undergoing irreversible regime shifts). While fundamental for management, concrete ways to estimate and interpret resilience in real ecosystems are still lacking. Here, we develop an empirical approach to estimate resilience based on the stochastic cusp model derived from catastrophe theory. The cusp model models tipping points derived from a cusp bifurcation. We extend cusp in order to identify the presence of stable and unstable states in complex natural systems. Our Cusp Resilience Assessment (CUSPRA) has three characteristics: (i) it provides estimates on how likely a system is to cross a tipping point (in the form of a cusp bifurcation) characterized by hysteresis, (ii) it assesses resilience in relation to multiple external drivers and (iii) it produces straightforward results for ecosystem-based management. We validate our approach using simulated data and demonstrate its application using empirical time series of an Atlantic cod population and marine ecosystems in the North Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. We show that Cusp Resilience Assessment is a powerful method to empirically estimate resilience in support of a sustainable management of our constantly adapting ecosystems under global climate change.Files
rspb.2024.0089.pdf
Files
(16.0 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:ed709bdbd74299c5e809a411bc7722fe
|
16.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Translated title (Arabic)
- تقييم المرونة في النظم الطبيعية المعقدة
- Translated title (English)
- Resilience assessment in complex natural systems
- Translated title (Spanish)
- Resilience assessment in complex natural systems
Identifiers
- Other
- https://openalex.org/W4399142295
- DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2024.0089
References
- https://openalex.org/W1556286466
- https://openalex.org/W1966512215
- https://openalex.org/W1975385254
- https://openalex.org/W1980088679
- https://openalex.org/W1985882378
- https://openalex.org/W1992347263
- https://openalex.org/W2013075315
- https://openalex.org/W2035576120
- https://openalex.org/W2049546703
- https://openalex.org/W2053610070
- https://openalex.org/W2062549118
- https://openalex.org/W2066190336
- https://openalex.org/W2069994241
- https://openalex.org/W2070641830
- https://openalex.org/W2078935012
- https://openalex.org/W2090359786
- https://openalex.org/W2096885696
- https://openalex.org/W2098848300
- https://openalex.org/W2103948957
- https://openalex.org/W2110180213
- https://openalex.org/W2115057255
- https://openalex.org/W2116199452
- https://openalex.org/W2124565737
- https://openalex.org/W2125416062
- https://openalex.org/W2125807959
- https://openalex.org/W2128573963
- https://openalex.org/W2135620858
- https://openalex.org/W2143222716
- https://openalex.org/W2143979076
- https://openalex.org/W2145932365
- https://openalex.org/W2146073476
- https://openalex.org/W2148326106
- https://openalex.org/W2150496467
- https://openalex.org/W2150918587
- https://openalex.org/W2153268540
- https://openalex.org/W2154158757
- https://openalex.org/W2158678754
- https://openalex.org/W2158956153
- https://openalex.org/W2171347391
- https://openalex.org/W2274815048
- https://openalex.org/W2396349987
- https://openalex.org/W2485490013
- https://openalex.org/W2567677537
- https://openalex.org/W2608173701
- https://openalex.org/W2617484285
- https://openalex.org/W2622939515
- https://openalex.org/W2644012878
- https://openalex.org/W2738516213
- https://openalex.org/W2766310625
- https://openalex.org/W2787154907
- https://openalex.org/W2789908241
- https://openalex.org/W2793916360
- https://openalex.org/W2801767841
- https://openalex.org/W2889054159
- https://openalex.org/W2914093658
- https://openalex.org/W2922309669
- https://openalex.org/W2951319617
- https://openalex.org/W2960469817
- https://openalex.org/W3161403858
- https://openalex.org/W3179264998
- https://openalex.org/W3181853065
- https://openalex.org/W3183577008
- https://openalex.org/W3212899701
- https://openalex.org/W3217658986
- https://openalex.org/W4200621049
- https://openalex.org/W4213386705
- https://openalex.org/W4286685704
- https://openalex.org/W4292974780
- https://openalex.org/W4296736585
- https://openalex.org/W4306246725
- https://openalex.org/W4309701508
- https://openalex.org/W4313640301
- https://openalex.org/W4380360333
- https://openalex.org/W4386754337