Published May 1, 2024 | Version v1
Publication Open

Resilience assessment in complex natural systems

  • 1. University of Padua
  • 2. Universität Hamburg
  • 3. Joint Research Centre
  • 4. University of Patras
  • 5. International Livestock Research Institute

Description

Ecological resilience is the capability of an ecosystem to maintain the same structure and function and avoid crossing catastrophic tipping points (i.e. undergoing irreversible regime shifts). While fundamental for management, concrete ways to estimate and interpret resilience in real ecosystems are still lacking. Here, we develop an empirical approach to estimate resilience based on the stochastic cusp model derived from catastrophe theory. The cusp model models tipping points derived from a cusp bifurcation. We extend cusp in order to identify the presence of stable and unstable states in complex natural systems. Our Cusp Resilience Assessment (CUSPRA) has three characteristics: (i) it provides estimates on how likely a system is to cross a tipping point (in the form of a cusp bifurcation) characterized by hysteresis, (ii) it assesses resilience in relation to multiple external drivers and (iii) it produces straightforward results for ecosystem-based management. We validate our approach using simulated data and demonstrate its application using empirical time series of an Atlantic cod population and marine ecosystems in the North Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. We show that Cusp Resilience Assessment is a powerful method to empirically estimate resilience in support of a sustainable management of our constantly adapting ecosystems under global climate change.

⚠️ This is an automatic machine translation with an accuracy of 90-95%

Translated Description (Arabic)

المرونة البيئية هي قدرة النظام البيئي على الحفاظ على نفس الهيكل والوظيفة وتجنب عبور نقاط التحول الكارثية (أي الخضوع لتحولات النظام التي لا رجعة فيها). على الرغم من أنها أساسية للإدارة، إلا أنه لا تزال هناك حاجة إلى طرق ملموسة لتقدير وتفسير المرونة في النظم الإيكولوجية الحقيقية. هنا، نطور نهجًا تجريبيًا لتقدير المرونة بناءً على نموذج الحدبة العشوائية المستمد من نظرية الكارثة. يقوم نموذج الشرفة بنمذجة نقاط الانقلاب المستمدة من تشعب الشرفة. نحن نوسع الشرفة من أجل تحديد وجود حالات مستقرة وغير مستقرة في النظم الطبيعية المعقدة. يتميز تقييمنا لمرونة الشرفة (CUSPRA) بثلاث خصائص: (1) يوفر تقديرات حول مدى احتمال عبور النظام لنقطة تحول (في شكل تشعب الشرفة) تتميز بالتخلف، (2) يقيم المرونة فيما يتعلق بالعديد من الدوافع الخارجية و (3) ينتج عنه نتائج مباشرة للإدارة القائمة على النظام البيئي. نحن نتحقق من صحة نهجنا باستخدام بيانات محاكاة ونوضح تطبيقه باستخدام سلسلة زمنية تجريبية لسكان سمك القد الأطلسي والنظم الإيكولوجية البحرية في بحر الشمال والبحر الأبيض المتوسط. نظهر أن تقييم القدرة على الصمود Cusp هو طريقة قوية لتقدير المرونة تجريبيًا لدعم الإدارة المستدامة لنظمنا الإيكولوجية المتكيفة باستمرار في ظل تغير المناخ العالمي.

Translated Description (English)

Ecological resilience is the ability of an ecosystem to maintain the same structure and function and avoid crossing catastrophic tipping points (i.e. undergoing irreversible regime shifts). While fundamental for management, concrete ways to estimate and interpret resilience in real ecosystems are still lacking. Here, we develop an empirical approach to estimate resilience based on the stochastic cusp model derived from catastrophe theory. The cusp model models tipping points derived from a cusp bifurcation. We extend cusp in order to identify the presence of stable and unstable states in complex natural systems. Our Cusp Resilience Assessment (CUSPRA) has three characteristics: (i) it provides estimates on how likely a system is to cross a tipping point (in the form of a cusp bifurcation) characterized by hysteresis, (ii) it assesses resilience in relation to multiple external drivers and (iii) it produces straightforward results for ecosystem-based management. We validate our approach using simulated data and demonstrate its application using empirical time series of an Atlantic cod population and marine ecosystems in the North Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. We show that Cusp Resilience Assessment is a powerful method to empirically estimate resilience in support of a sustainable management of our constantly adapting ecosystems under global climate change.

Translated Description (Spanish)

Ecological resilience is the capability of an ecosystem to maintain the same structure and function and avoid crossing catastrophic tipping points (i.e. undergoing irreversible regime shifts). While fundamental for management, concrete ways to estimate and interpret resilience in real ecosystems are still lacking. Here, we develop an empirical approach to estimate resilience based on the stochastic cusp model derived from catastrophe theory. The cusp model models tipping points derived from a cusp bifurcation. We extend cusp in order to identify the presence of stable and unstable states in complex natural systems. Our Cusp Resilience Assessment (CUSPRA) has three characteristics: (i) it provides estimates on how likely a system is to cross a tipping point (in the form of a cusp bifurcation) characterized by hysteresis, (ii) it assesses resilience in relation to multiple external drivers and (iii) it produces straightforward results for ecosystem-based management. We validate our approach using simulated data and demonstrate its application using empirical time series of an Atlantic cod population and marine ecosystems in the North Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. We show that Cusp Resilience Assessment is a powerful method to empirically estimate resilience in support of a sustainable management of our constantly adapting ecosystems under global climate change.

Files

rspb.2024.0089.pdf

Files (16.0 kB)

⚠️ Please wait a few minutes before your translated files are ready ⚠️ Note: Some files might be protected thus translations might not work.
Name Size Download all
md5:ed709bdbd74299c5e809a411bc7722fe
16.0 kB
Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Translated title (Arabic)
تقييم المرونة في النظم الطبيعية المعقدة
Translated title (English)
Resilience assessment in complex natural systems
Translated title (Spanish)
Resilience assessment in complex natural systems

Identifiers

Other
https://openalex.org/W4399142295
DOI
10.1098/rspb.2024.0089

GreSIS Basics Section

Is Global South Knowledge
Yes
Country
Kenya

References

  • https://openalex.org/W1556286466
  • https://openalex.org/W1966512215
  • https://openalex.org/W1975385254
  • https://openalex.org/W1980088679
  • https://openalex.org/W1985882378
  • https://openalex.org/W1992347263
  • https://openalex.org/W2013075315
  • https://openalex.org/W2035576120
  • https://openalex.org/W2049546703
  • https://openalex.org/W2053610070
  • https://openalex.org/W2062549118
  • https://openalex.org/W2066190336
  • https://openalex.org/W2069994241
  • https://openalex.org/W2070641830
  • https://openalex.org/W2078935012
  • https://openalex.org/W2090359786
  • https://openalex.org/W2096885696
  • https://openalex.org/W2098848300
  • https://openalex.org/W2103948957
  • https://openalex.org/W2110180213
  • https://openalex.org/W2115057255
  • https://openalex.org/W2116199452
  • https://openalex.org/W2124565737
  • https://openalex.org/W2125416062
  • https://openalex.org/W2125807959
  • https://openalex.org/W2128573963
  • https://openalex.org/W2135620858
  • https://openalex.org/W2143222716
  • https://openalex.org/W2143979076
  • https://openalex.org/W2145932365
  • https://openalex.org/W2146073476
  • https://openalex.org/W2148326106
  • https://openalex.org/W2150496467
  • https://openalex.org/W2150918587
  • https://openalex.org/W2153268540
  • https://openalex.org/W2154158757
  • https://openalex.org/W2158678754
  • https://openalex.org/W2158956153
  • https://openalex.org/W2171347391
  • https://openalex.org/W2274815048
  • https://openalex.org/W2396349987
  • https://openalex.org/W2485490013
  • https://openalex.org/W2567677537
  • https://openalex.org/W2608173701
  • https://openalex.org/W2617484285
  • https://openalex.org/W2622939515
  • https://openalex.org/W2644012878
  • https://openalex.org/W2738516213
  • https://openalex.org/W2766310625
  • https://openalex.org/W2787154907
  • https://openalex.org/W2789908241
  • https://openalex.org/W2793916360
  • https://openalex.org/W2801767841
  • https://openalex.org/W2889054159
  • https://openalex.org/W2914093658
  • https://openalex.org/W2922309669
  • https://openalex.org/W2951319617
  • https://openalex.org/W2960469817
  • https://openalex.org/W3161403858
  • https://openalex.org/W3179264998
  • https://openalex.org/W3181853065
  • https://openalex.org/W3183577008
  • https://openalex.org/W3212899701
  • https://openalex.org/W3217658986
  • https://openalex.org/W4200621049
  • https://openalex.org/W4213386705
  • https://openalex.org/W4286685704
  • https://openalex.org/W4292974780
  • https://openalex.org/W4296736585
  • https://openalex.org/W4306246725
  • https://openalex.org/W4309701508
  • https://openalex.org/W4313640301
  • https://openalex.org/W4380360333
  • https://openalex.org/W4386754337