STABILITY ASSESSMENT OF UNDERGROUND OPENINGS USING DIFFERENT ROCK SUPPORT SYSTEMS
- 1. Assiut University
- 2. King Abdulaziz University
Description
Rock support systems have become widely dominant components in underground hard rock mines. They are used to maintain the stability of underground openings and reinforce disturbed rock masses after creating an excavation or start- ing mining activity. Thus, the objective of this study is to examine the effect of support types on the performance stabil- ity of underground tunnels that exist in hard rock mines, in terms of deformation, the extent of failure zones and the strength of the rock mass surrounding the tunnel. This, in turn, will help in the selection of an appropriate support system that mitigates the stress-deformation conditions around the tunnel. Herein, four models have been built using the RS2D program, simulated and introduced to evaluate the behaviour of an underground tunnel with different rock support systems. The first model is simulated without any support system, whereas, rock bolts have been installed in the second model. The third model applied only shotcrete, while rock bolts and shotcrete are combined together in the fourth model. The results are presented and discussed in terms of strength factor, the extent of yielding zones and rock mass displacement/convergence. The results show that tunnel stability suffers when there is no rock support at all, while, it is significantly improved when the rock support system is installed. The optimum improvement is obtained when both shotcrete and rock bolts are employed together.
Translated Descriptions
Translated Description (Arabic)
أصبحت أنظمة دعم الصخور مكونات مهيمنة على نطاق واسع في مناجم الصخور الصلبة تحت الأرض. يتم استخدامها للحفاظ على استقرار الفتحات تحت الأرض وتعزيز الكتل الصخرية المضطربة بعد إنشاء الحفر أو بدء نشاط التعدين. وبالتالي، فإن الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو دراسة تأثير أنواع الدعم على استقرار أداء الأنفاق تحت الأرض الموجودة في مناجم الصخور الصلبة، من حيث التشوه ومدى مناطق الفشل وقوة الكتلة الصخرية المحيطة بالنفق. وهذا بدوره سيساعد في اختيار نظام دعم مناسب يخفف من ظروف تشوه الإجهاد حول النفق. في عام، تم بناء أربعة نماذج باستخدام برنامج RS2D، وتمت محاكاتها وإدخالها لتقييم سلوك نفق تحت الأرض مع أنظمة دعم صخرية مختلفة. تتم محاكاة النموذج الأول دون أي نظام دعم، في حين تم تركيب مسامير صخرية في النموذج الثاني. تم تطبيق النموذج الثالث فقط على الخرسانة المرشوشة، في حين تم الجمع بين البراغي الصخرية والخرسانة المرشوشة معًا في النموذج الرابع. يتم عرض النتائج ومناقشتها من حيث عامل القوة، ومدى مناطق الخضوع وإزاحة/تقارب الكتلة الصخرية. تظهر النتائج أن استقرار النفق يعاني عندما لا يكون هناك دعم للصخور على الإطلاق، بينما يتحسن بشكل كبير عند تثبيت نظام دعم الصخور. يتم الحصول على التحسين الأمثل عند استخدام كل من مسامير الخرسانة المرشوشة والصخور معًا.Translated Description (English)
Rock support systems have become widely dominant components in underground hard rock mines. They are used to maintain the stability of underground openings and reinforce disturbed rock masses after creating an excavation or starting mining activity. Thus, the objective of this study is to examine the effect of support types on the performance stability of underground tunnels that exist in hard rock mines, in terms of deformation, the extent of failure zones and the strength of the rock mass surrounding the tunnel. This, in turn, will help in the selection of an appropriate support system that mitigates the stress-deformation conditions around the tunnel. In, four models have been built using the RS2D program, simulated and introduced to evaluate the behaviour of an underground tunnel with different rock support systems. The first model is simulated without any support system, whereas rock bolts have been installed in the second model. The third model applied only shotcrete, while rock bolts and shotcrete are combined together in the fourth model. The results are presented and discussed in terms of strength factor, the extent of yielding zones and rock mass displacement/convergence. The results show that tunnel stability suffers when there is no rock support at all, while it is significantly improved when the rock support system is installed. The optimum improvement is obtained when both shotcrete and rock bolts are employed together.Translated Description (French)
Rock support systems have become widely dominant components in underground hard rock mines. They are used to maintain the stability of underground openings and reinforce disturbed rock masses after creating an excavation or start- ing mining activity. Thus, the objective of this study is to examine the effect of support types on the performance stabil- ity of underground tunnels that exist in hard rock mines, in terms of deformation, the extent of failure zones and the strength of the rock mass surrounding the tunnel. This, in turn, will help in the selection of an appropriate support system that mitigates the stress-deformation conditions around the tunnel. Entrez, quatre modèles ont été construits en utilisant le programme RS2D, simulé et présenté pour évaluer le comportement d'un tunnel souterrain avec des systèmes de support rock différents. The first model is simulated without any support system, whereas, rock bolts have been installed in the second model. The third model applied only shotcrete, while rock bolts and shotcrete are combined together in the fourth model. Les résultats sont présentés et discutés dans les termes du facteur de sévérité, de l'extension des zones de protection et du déplacement/convergence de la masse du rock. The results show that tunnel stability suffers when there is no rock support at all, while, it is significativement improved when the rock support system is installed. L'amélioration optimale est obtenue lorsque les deux boulons de crêtes et de roches sont employés ensemble.Translated Description (Spanish)
Rock support systems have become widely dominant components in underground hard rock mines. They are used to maintain the stability of underground openings and reinforce disturbed rock masses after creating an excavation or start- ing mining activity. Thus, the objective of this study is to examine the effect of support types on the performance stabil- ity of underground tunnels that exist in hard rock mines, in terms of deformation, the extent of failure zones and the strength of the rock mass surrounding the tunel. This, in turn, will help in the selection of an appropriate support system that mitigates the stress-deformation conditions around the tunel. Adelante, cuatro modelos han sido construidos utilizando el programa RS2D, simulado e introducido para evaluar el comportamiento de un túnel subterráneo con diferentes sistemas de soporte de roca. The first model is simulated without any support system, whereas, rock bolts have been installed in the second model. The third model applied only shotcrete, while rock bolts and shotcrete are combined together in the fourth model. The results are presented and discussed in terms of strength factor, the extent of yielding zones and rock mass displacement/convergence. The results show that tunnel stability suffers when there is no rock support at all, while, it is significantly improved when the rock support system is installed. The optimum improvement is obtained when both shotcrete and rock bolts are employed together.Files
      
        340530.pdf
        
      
    
    
      
        Files
         (5.1 MB)
        
      
    
    | Name | Size | Download all | 
|---|---|---|
| md5:202250a20e500ad4bb4c03126080d94f | 5.1 MB | Preview Download | 
Additional details
Additional titles
- Translated title (Arabic)
- تقييم استقرار الفتحات تحت الأرض باستخدام أنظمة دعم الصخور المختلفة
- Translated title (English)
- STABILITY ASSESSMENT OF UNDERGROUND OPENINGS USING DIFFERENT ROCK SUPPORT SYSTEMS
- Translated title (French)
- ÉVALUATION DE LA STABILITÉ DES OUVERTURES SOUTERRAINES À L'AIDE DE DIFFÉRENTS SYSTÈMES DE SUPPORT ROCK
- Translated title (Spanish)
- EVALUACIÓN DE LA ESTABILIDAD DE LAS APERTURAS SUBTERRÁNEAS UTILIZANDO DIFERENTES SISTEMAS DE SOPORTE DE ROCA
Identifiers
- Other
- https://openalex.org/W3005653024
- DOI
- 10.17794/rgn.2020.1.5
            
              References
            
          
        - https://openalex.org/W1552623717
- https://openalex.org/W1977168082
- https://openalex.org/W2016348351
- https://openalex.org/W2046574364
- https://openalex.org/W2074275348
- https://openalex.org/W2087874905
- https://openalex.org/W2127635697
- https://openalex.org/W2141681593
- https://openalex.org/W2523505021
- https://openalex.org/W2735288118
- https://openalex.org/W2972848388
- https://openalex.org/W30332750
- https://openalex.org/W3176615821